That said, it looks like they orchestrated the existing, well trodden set list rather than come up with something new for the evening. Whereas the set list for Dublin (RTE String evening) in 2014 was markedly different from the rest of the tour. The songs were better chosen for a strings project.While I only attended the first night in Dublin and the second got better reviews, I didn't recall the setlist being markedly different from the other tour dates. A quick review of the 2014 tour page here on VRM seems to support my view.
I thought then that there were many BF & Roxy songs which would better suit orchestral arrangement (most of the IYM and TBSB albums for starters) and that it was rather an opportunity missed. Sadly, I think the same could be said of the Hollywood Bowl setlist.
Of course, there would probably be significant expense in shaking up the setlist for the sake of one or two shows, but I'd have hoped for something special for the prices being charged in Hollywood.
The lack of variation in the setlist from gig to gig has always been a bit of a bugbear for me anyway; surely most musicians would enjoy playing something fresh most nights?
It's in stark contrast with the E Street Band, which has to know pretty much every song ever written by Springsteen (plus a major chunk of general rock 'n roll history), as The Boss takes audience requests each night.
Even some less well known bands reward their fans' loyalty in this way, e.g. the first time I heard Gov't Mule in London they were aware that a small group of Germans and Scandinavians were following them around the UK & Europe, so they deliberately changed the entire setlist from the previous night in Manchester.
Now, where did I put my anti-grumpy medication?
