View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
robertoxy
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming  Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:51 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:39 pm
Posts: 36
|
|
Its starting to grow on me the more I listen.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dexter
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:23 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Germany
|
|
My God, what a negative bunch you are. Second comment and goodbye!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
application'sfailed
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:46 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 19
|
|
Sorry Dexter............it is a bit negative, but just out of bitter disappointment.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ann laenen
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:56 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 69
|
|
Lot's of negative criticism indeed (as often...!). I know myself well enough to know that I will need to listen several times to the album before being able to make up my mind. Surprises me how quickly you all judge after just a few mini-samples!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
avalon_eyes
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:20 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 579
|
|
I think i'll wait for the entire album to listen to and then make my mind up. but listen , guys, we're all getting older and a bit more grumpy. Its never going to 1973 again, or 1987, or 1994.
I'm amazed at how Ferry has re-invented/kept himself as a brand. Good on him. I don't think he'll hit the high spots again, as a musician or composer, but there's a whole body of work to listen to and that will do me.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ann laenen
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:14 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 69
|
|
"It's never gong to 1973 again, or 1987, or 1994..."
Couldn't say it better! This little sentence expresses perfectly the frustrations of some members here.. Well said!!!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
le freak
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:57 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 866
|
|
I don`t care for neither 1973, 1987, or 1994.
-And mark my words, I don`t even care for 1973! Whoever listens to "Stranded" anymore?
What counts is 1980, 1981, and 1982.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Roxy
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:31 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:44 am
Posts: 1177
|
Quote: And mark my words, I don`t even care for 1973! Whoever listens to "Stranded" anymore?
I do, quite often!  
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ann laenen
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:21 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 69
|
|
Me too!!! It's my favourite RMalbum!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
CPL 593H
|
Post subject: Re: A bit underwhelming Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:25 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:46 pm
Posts: 45
|
|
Certainly NOT 1980 or 1981! (or 1985 or 1987 for that matter).
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
